Hello, my name is Flower.
Could I perhaps have the original words of the questioner quoted? I wonder if we could discuss this in steps? What are the key issues here? I'm sure we can come up with new ideas and approaches. Perhaps we could give examples? I love you all, the world and everything in it.
First of all, I want to extend my support to the questioner, even from a distance. I can imagine that it must be challenging to navigate the conflicting demands of reducing work pressure while facing pressure from your leader. At the same time, it must be difficult to find ways to avoid the weekly meetings you don't like! Perhaps, let's explore these from a different perspective.
? A summary of the main issues that the questioner is facing is as follows:
At the meeting, they have to report on their performance and what they have learned, which can sometimes feel a bit tedious.
Despite the questioner's proposal to alter the meeting process, it has not been accepted. Instead, the leader has requested a meeting with the questioner, citing the need to avoid the meeting as the reason for this request.
The 25-year-old questioner needs to take high blood pressure medication every day, hoping to protect himself by reducing stress.
? How might we address these significant challenges?
I must admit that I am not particularly enthusiastic about the weekly meetings. The leader maintains that they are intended to be beneficial, offering training and other forms of assistance.
I feel that some aspects of the meeting may not be as helpful as they could be. I understand the main purpose is to discuss performance and areas for improvement. I am open to this, and I am happy to discuss my performance in private messages. I also appreciate the opportunity to reflect on what we have learned at the end of each meeting.
Could I perhaps inquire as to whether there is a particular reason why this question was posed in this way?
It would be helpful to consider the possibility that some people may dislike meetings because they are uncomfortable with the inner psychology and self-needs that meetings often evoke.
If I might offer my own perspective, I would probably also prefer to be asked about my performance in a private message from my leader. After all, reporting performance in public seems to invite praise if the performance is good, but also envy and criticism if the performance is not good, but also encouragement. I wonder if the questioner also has these concerns?
If there is, it may be an indication that we place a great deal of value on the opinions of others. This could potentially be one of the reasons why the questioner is reluctant to participate in the meeting.
If the questioner feels that those things are not helpful, it would be interesting to understand what the questioner expects to learn in the meeting. It would also be valuable to gain insight into the specific thoughts, expectations, and needs behind those who don't want to participate in the meeting.
The questioner may wish to consider this carefully.
Perhaps it would be helpful to try to put ourselves in the other person's shoes and consider why a leader might choose to have a meeting instead of a private chat.
If we were in a position to provide individual, private feedback on each employee's specific work, how much time would that realistically take? What are the potential benefits of group feedback?
Perhaps we can find commonalities, be more targeted, and learn from each other. It seems that company systems must have their reason for existence, after all, existence justifies reason.
However, we can also raise objections based on our needs. For example, I wonder if there might be a better way to do this. I must admit, I'm not a big fan of these meetings.
I suggested a potential change to the meeting process, but unfortunately, there was no response and the current approach was maintained. When an objection is raised and it doesn't work, it might be helpful to consider why.
It may be the case that no one has yet found a solution that is demonstrably superior to the current one. What the questioner may need is to identify a demand that most people agree with and are willing to do, establish a solution, and improve the meeting process.
It is possible to discuss failure cases without attacking each other and share opinions in a non-aggressive manner. Similarly, you can share successful sales cases, sales experiences, and methods, and discuss the sales theories you have learned. You can then put them into practice afterwards.
If I might suggest, in order to effect change, it would be helpful to have a concrete plan in place.
Perhaps it would be helpful to take a moment to reassess and recognize the difficulty, dislike, and stress of the routine.
If the most difficult, most offensive, and most stressful items are each worth 10 points, could I inquire as to how the questioner would rate the difficulty, offensiveness, and stressfulness of the weekly meetings? Is this level of difficulty completely unacceptable?
Could we perhaps consider ways to reduce the difficulty level? If we focus on the weekly meeting, we may perceive it as taking up a significant amount of time and having little meaning.
If we consider the time separately, we can see that there are 24 hours in a day, excluding 8 hours of sleep and 2 hours of eating, leaving 14 hours. This means that a week is 14*7=98 hours, with the weekly meeting taking up 2/98, which is about 2.04%. When we use numerical data for statistics, we can see that these two hours are just a small part of the week.
Perhaps it would be helpful to consider the three aspects of difficulty, repulsiveness, and stress, and to think about what the questioner might be willing to do to reduce their scores.
It might be helpful to consider the value of meetings in a more positive light and to try to reduce the pressure of working on your own.
Could it be that we dislike meetings because we view them as a task we would rather avoid?
It would be beneficial to consider the advantages of meetings. For instance, we could cultivate the positive habit of promptly recording our performance, gain insight into statistical trends, and assess our weekly progress before the meeting.
As an alternative, you might consider reviewing the sales situation of the week before the meeting. This could be an opportunity to acknowledge your achievements and identify areas for improvement. You may find that this approach is more valuable than simply preparing a report.
It might also be helpful to view reporting as a way of sharing information, communicating with colleagues, and engaging in a non-judgmental discussion. This could be an effective approach for reducing stress in complex work situations.
As an alternative, you might consider using online documents and online forms to record your performance in a timely manner, which could help to alleviate the need to recall information before the summary. If the meeting is particularly challenging, it might be helpful to focus on other tasks.
I hope the above sharing is helpful to the questioner, and I wish you the best.
Comments
I totally get why you feel that way about the meetings. It's frustrating when they don't seem to align with what we need, and it feels like a performance review every time.
It seems like the meetings are causing you a lot of stress, especially given your health condition. Maybe it's worth having an honest conversation with your leader about how the current format affects you.
I understand the discomfort you're experiencing. These meetings can be quite draining. Have you considered proposing alternative ways to report on tasks or receive training that might be more effective for you?
The pressure from these meetings is real, and it's understandable you want to avoid them. Perhaps finding a middle ground, like submitting a written update, could help alleviate some of the stress.
It sounds like the meetings are really getting under your skin. If changing the process isn't working, maybe talking about adjusting the timing or format could be beneficial for everyone involved.