Greetings!
After reading your description, my initial impression is that the individual in question is someone who is highly attuned to the feelings of others and who may, as a result, tend to "bury" their own feelings.
The aforementioned care does not pertain to the capacity to safeguard others.
In contrast, I perceive a need for protection.
In order to avoid being violated by others, one must relinquish one's own strength.
Let us examine this matter in greater detail.
I will unconsciously direct my attention toward others in my environment. However, I have come to recognize that when I do so, I experience a sense of unease and a loss of control.
The term "out of control" can be understood to signify the act of responding to external stimuli based on the reactions of others.
It is a relatively simple and agreeable process to refrain from questioning the underlying motives of others. As long as one aligns with the opinions and values of those around them, they can maintain their own existence. I will unconsciously pay attention to others in the environment with my mind.
This passage can be understood in a straightforward manner as follows:
1. Prioritize the external environment, respond to the reactions of others, and experience discomfort and a loss of control.
2. The only methods by which an individual may feel as though they can survive are to ignore their own needs and feelings, to blindly attempt to please others, to conform to the crowd, and to cling to others.
The aforementioned situation may be attributed to one's upbringing.
The landlord may have been raised in a manner that is particularly strict, and tenants are expected to adhere to the landlord's wishes. Tenants must live their lives in accordance with the landlord's standards.
In such a situation, the only way to survive is to comply with the other person's expectations and agree with them.
Such an individual may evoke feelings of anxiety, fear, depression, a sense of being out of control, suffocation, grievance, and anger. In their presence, one may adopt a cautious and circumspect manner of living.
When this sentiment becomes deeply entrenched in one's psyche, it tends to manifest in one's interactions with all individuals encountered in life.
Even in the presence of individuals who are friendly and amiable, one may still experience feelings of nervousness and intimidation.
Furthermore, I am still uncertain as to how I should present myself in a natural and down-to-earth manner when interacting with others.
Frequently, upon encountering another individual, I involuntarily display a smile. Alternatively, I may engage in self-promotion, which can be perceived as a direct confrontation with those in my immediate vicinity. In this instance, I am simultaneously evaluating my own deficiencies and elevating the other person.
I posit that this is a sign of immaturity. It is imperative to express one's emotions openly.
The meaning of this passage is as follows:
1. An expression that is incongruous with the circumstances and the expectations of the audience.
2. It is recommended that one should smile at people habitually, even in the event of experiencing distress or fear, or when the other person is benevolent.
3. The host subscribes to the notion that concealing one's emotions is indicative of maturity.
An unnatural expression is indicative of a reluctance to display one's genuine emotions.
The host may be subconsciously motivated to conceal their emotional state, particularly if they are experiencing discomfort or frustration, for fear of becoming unpopular.
It can be argued that the only way to ensure the happiness of others is to display a welcoming demeanor, particularly through the use of a smile.
Maturity is not defined by the absence of emotional expression. The act of concealing one's emotions can, in fact, be a form of repression.
Indeed, one's emotions are a private matter and can be expressed in a manner that is deemed appropriate.
For example, verbal expression or normal, polite interaction without the need to cater to others.
In addition, it would be beneficial to gain insight into the concept of being immersed and natural in one's own self. Based on personal experience, it can be observed that the act of being oneself can potentially lead to behaviors that are perceived as self-absorbed and intrusive by others.
For example, this could include activities such as listening to audio files, engaging in self-talk, or interacting with pets in a relaxed manner.
What is the extent to which one can be oneself? Does one's sense of self remain intact when one is being oneself?
How might an individual with an inclination towards performance and a desire for attention achieve a balance between these two aspects of their identity?
The original poster's intent is to convey the following:
1. From my own experience, emotional exposure can affect others and make them uncomfortable. I am interested in learning more about what it is like to be at one with one's mind and body.
2. What are the means of providing care for others while maintaining one's own identity?
3. What is the most effective method for garnering attention without resorting to performance-based tactics?
Additionally, the original poster asserted that emotional expressiveness can evoke discomfort in others, a perspective shaped by their personal history.
It would be erroneous to assume that past experience is necessarily applicable in the present, or indeed that it has universal applicability.
Given that one is interacting with a different individual, it is not feasible to rely solely on one's past experiences as the sole reference point.
To achieve a state of mind-body unity and full immersion, it is essential to focus on one's own feelings and utilize them as a guiding principle.
One can only be expected to care for others when one has first ensured one's own well-being.
The ability to be oneself while simultaneously attending to the needs of others represents a fundamental aspect of social experience.
The principles of social ethics, the legal and regulatory framework, and the fundamental tenets of interpersonal relationships are widely accepted.
In the event of uncertainty regarding the optimal level, it is advisable to solicit feedback from others.
For example, when the audio is playing, one can inquire of the individuals in one's vicinity whether the volume is a source of disturbance. Additionally, one might inquire as to the volume level itself.
Should the audio prove disruptive to others, it is recommended that headphones be utilized.
For example, when engaging in self-talk, it is advisable to observe the content of the discourse and the duration of the monologue.
The content of one's speech is unlikely to cause harm, has a relatively short duration, and is unlikely to have a significant impact on others.
Should one be unable to resolve a problem by engaging in self-reflection, one may solicit or request the assistance of another individual to engage in discourse on the matter. In the event that another person is present, they will not be unduly disturbed.
It can be argued that relaxed interaction with pets is not something that will affect others, but rather represents a form of self-healing.
It can be reasonably assumed that others will perceive you as caring when they observe you interacting and conversing with your pets in a relaxed manner.
In conclusion, it is essential to recognize that one's individuality is of paramount importance.
In your current location, you will not impede the progress of others.
It is not within the power of others to infringe upon one's autonomy, as they are not responsible for every aspect of one's identity. Consequently, they cannot reasonably demand excessive levels of compliance from an individual.
It is imperative to liberate oneself from the constraints that bind one's mind and spirit. One deserves the freedom to pursue one's own path and realize one's potential.
The aforementioned points are to be considered.
My name is Yan Guilai, and I am a practicing psychologist. I extend my best wishes to you.
Comments
I can relate to feeling uneasy when focusing too much on others. It's like we're constantly adjusting our behavior based on their reactions, almost losing track of what we truly want or feel. Over time, I've learned that being natural means not seeking validation from everyone around us. Instead, it's about staying true to who we are and expressing ourselves authentically without worrying if it's pleasing to others.
It sounds like you're really introspective about how you interact with the world. Sometimes I think we all put on a performance for others, especially when we're unsure of ourselves. But finding that balance between acknowledging others and staying grounded in our own identity is key. Perhaps it's about accepting that it's okay not to have all the answers and allowing ourselves to be imperfect.
The pressure to conform and please can be overwhelming. In my experience, embracing moments of solitude helps me reconnect with myself. Talking to pets or even just enjoying silence can remind us of who we are outside of societal expectations. Maybe being yourself is about integrating those quiet, genuine moments into your daily interactions with others.
Your question about the scope of being oneself is intriguing. To me, it's about setting boundaries where you respect your needs and feelings while also considering the impact on those around you. It's a delicate balance, but it's possible to be expressive without being intrusive. Being aware of this can help guide how we present ourselves.
Finding that middle ground between performing for attention and being genuinely selfexpressed is challenging. I believe it starts with understanding why we crave that external validation. Once we address those underlying reasons, we can work towards a more balanced expression of our true selves, one that doesn't overshadow our authentic nature.