Greetings. I extend to you a 360-degree embrace.
From the responses to the brief inquiries, it is evident that there are only three individuals residing in the dormitory, with the other two exhibiting a closer affiliation. It appears that you have become an outsider, which may elicit feelings of sadness and depression.
It is a common assumption that students are the most innocent of all social groups. However, school friendships are also a kind of social relationship, and for many people, these relationships are naturally complicated.
A recent news item reported on a female university dormitory with six residents and ten groups. Online commentators expressed concern about the stability of these relationships, suggesting that the situation was a real-life version of the historical Chinese drama Empresses in the Palace.
For someone like me, who lacked even a telephone in the dormitory during my college years, it is difficult to imagine the conversations of six people or ten groups. However, upon reflection, I recall the existence of small groups of eight individuals in our dormitory.
Upon reflection, it becomes evident that there have been instances where groups consisted of two individuals, groups of three, and instances where individuals acted independently, engaged in conflict, and experienced periods of estrangement. Additionally, there have been numerous instances of collective activities within these groups.
The situation you encountered may be more extreme. Additionally, there are only three people, so once two of them form an alliance, the other person will immediately be left out. According to the findings of psychologists, the optimal number of people in a stable small group is between five and nine. Groups with more or fewer individuals than this range are less likely to function effectively.
In many group-like TV dramas, the number of people in a small group is also generally within this range. For example, the five beauties in "Ode to Joy," the four-person group in "Pink Girls" many years ago, and the six-person group in "My Own Swordsman." Additionally, abroad, there are "Sex and the City," "Desperate Housewives," "Friends," "The Big Bang Theory," and "How I Met Your Mother," among others.
This is due to the fact that, in a larger group, if two individuals form an alliance, at least two additional individuals are likely to remain aligned. Similarly, if two individuals engage in conflict, there are often others who can facilitate a resolution.
This kind of team is more resilient. If there are three people, two will form an alliance, leaving the remaining person isolated.
It can be argued that regardless of the number of individuals involved, there will always be someone who is excluded from the group. This phenomenon is likely to occur in a variety of social contexts, particularly among young women, who are often perceived as being more difficult to understand and having more complex personalities.
It is not uncommon for a group of girls to gang up on one girl.
In light of the aforementioned, it can be stated that the situation in question is not uncommon. From a psychological and behavioral standpoint, a team comprising three individuals may exhibit greater rigidity than a team with a larger number of members in certain circumstances.
Such a team is not as resilient or flexible as a team comprising a greater number of individuals.
Let us consider how you should view this situation. I am unaware of your age, but I assume you have recently commenced your studies at the university.
It is necessary to discourage the assumption that other individuals are obliged to consider the emotional state of another person and assume responsibility for that person's sadness.
In other words, the emotional response to another's behavior is a personal matter. The responsibility for one's emotions lies with the individual, regardless of their source.
Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that we often speculate about the underlying motives behind another person's actions. For instance, you have indicated that they were aware of your emotional state, yet there is a possibility that they were not, or that they were aware but did not consider your feelings to be a priority.
In either case, it is a matter that pertains to other individuals and, as such, is beyond our purview.
It should be noted, however, that this is not the complete picture. It is important to accept that such situations are common between people, that we have no control over the actions of others, and that the other person is under no obligation to meet our expectations.
Concurrently, it is important to recognize that there are no limitations to what we can achieve.
For example, one might joke or inform the other person in a casual manner that they will be invited to dinner next time, noting that it is an unpleasant experience to eat alone. One can also take the initiative to join small groups, rather than waiting for others to discover one's presence and extend an invitation.
Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that expectations are not always met, and that the other person may or may not agree. It is, therefore, essential to accept these situations.
Furthermore, one may choose to engage in social activities with other individuals. It is likely that there are other students in the same class, or one may consider joining a club or other extracurricular activity. In summary, there are alternative options available.
It is recommended that you schedule an appointment with the school counselor to discuss the matter further.
As a counselor, I often find myself oscillating between pessimism and optimism. Nevertheless, I maintain a positive outlook on life.


Comments
I felt a bit left out when I realized the girl had gone to the cafeteria early. It would have been nice if someone had told me she was getting food ahead of time. Anyway, I suggested we all eat together, hoping to spend some time as a group. When I was waiting in line, it did feel a little lonely seeing them already eating. I wish they had asked what I wanted or saved me a spot.
It's frustrating that they didn't think to include me in their plans. I proposed eating together, and then finding out they started without me wasn't easy. Waiting in that long line while they enjoyed their meal made me feel quite isolated. They should have considered how that might make me feel and included me in the decisionmaking process.
When I saw them already digging into their meals, I couldn't help but feel a twinge of sadness. I thought we were going to eat together, and it seemed like they just went ahead without thinking about me. It would have been kinder if they had waited or at least asked what I wanted to order. It's disappointing when friends don't consider your feelings.
I tried to stay positive when I suggested we eat together, but it was hard not to feel overlooked when they began eating without me. The long wait in line felt even longer knowing they were already seated and enjoying their food. I hope next time they can be more mindful and include me in their choices, so we can all enjoy our meal as a group.