Good day, host.
I appreciate the depth and thoughtfulness of your inquiries, particularly given your age and level of engagement with introspection. I would be honored to contribute my insights on your self-description and questions for your reference.
It is possible to comprehend the reasons behind one's feelings of social disinterest in the context of one's innate temperament and acquired personality.
[Innate temperament] On the one hand, feeling socially boring may indicate that your innate temperament is introverted. Different psychologists have proposed different personality temperaments in their research on personality. One aspect of temperament is extraversion or introversion, which refers to a person's innate tendency to direct emotional and mental activity inwardly or outwardly.
This tendency is not inherently positive or negative; it is simply a different characteristic.
Extroverts tend to be more outwardly oriented in their emotional and cognitive activities. It is theorized that they have higher levels of dopamine in their bodies and require greater external stimulation to feel comfortable and energetic. Consequently, they are more likely to utilize socialization as a means of enhancing themselves and recharging. They are typically cheerful and sociable, passionate and outgoing, and are willing to seek assistance from others. However, they experience difficulty when alone and engaging in deep reflection on issues, let alone self-analysis and self-criticism.
Individuals who are introverted may exhibit behaviors that are the opposite of those described above. It is theorized that they have higher levels of acetylcholine in their bodies, which may make external stimuli overwhelming for them. As a result, socializing can feel draining, and they may need time to recharge by returning to a state of solitude. Introverts often have an inward focus in their emotional and cognitive activities. They may prefer to work quietly by themselves, engage in deep thinking about problems, and engage in self-analysis and self-criticism. They may also demonstrate less flexibility in interpersonal interactions and adaptability to the environment than extroverts.
Should you be interested, you may wish to undertake a temperament or personality test. There are a number of free online tests available, for example the Eysenck Temperament Questionnaire, or you may wish to purchase a similar test from the Yi Xinli platform. However, it should be noted that the results of psychological tests are only intended to facilitate a deeper understanding of oneself, rather than to provide definitive conclusions. It would be unwise, for instance, to make any sweeping generalisations based on the results of a test, such as 'I am an introvert, therefore I am not good at socialising and I will never improve socially because my parents gave me such bad genes'.
Alternatively, feelings of social disinterest may indicate an inability to receive nurturance in social settings. The original poster's assertion that they possess a generally agreeable personality is likely a significant factor contributing to their social disinterest and inclination to pursue academic activities at home.
For individuals with a pleasing personality, the true meaning of "putting interpersonal relationships first" is likely "putting the needs of others first." Consequently, socializing for them entails the expenditure of energy no longer on perceiving their own feelings and needs, but on attending to the feelings and needs of others. Their actions are also directed at satisfying the feelings and needs of others, in exchange for the comfort of being accepted, recognized, and loved in social situations without being resented or excluded. Therefore, individuals with a pleasing personality tend to get along well with everyone and appear to possess an outgoing and cheerful personality. However, their inner experiences are, in fact, quite different from those of extroverts who enjoy socializing.
Individuals who are not socially oriented but rather sociable, particularly extroverts, are typically not apprehensive about requesting assistance and are also highly inclined to provide help to others. This indicates that their psychological experience is one of pleasure and euphoria. Whether they are being helped to fulfill their own needs or assisting others in attending to their emotional needs and those of others, they derive enjoyment from it. Consequently, they are continuously able to feel nourished and empowered in social interactions. They perceive themselves as significant and deserving of better treatment, and they also recognize themselves as benevolent and capable of extending kindness to others. They are in such a positive emotional activity cycle in their relationships with others, so they are more inclined to invest in social interactions.
The objective of the "pleaser" is to "maintain harmony" in relationships. However, this harmony is often described as "superficial" due to the tendency of these individuals to prioritize the needs of others over their own. In essence, the "pleaser" does not fully express their authentic self when interacting with others, leading to a depletion of energy in the process of pleasing others and suppressing their own needs. It is not surprising that social interactions can result in a sense of exhaustion.
Furthermore, this kind of socializing can also result in feelings of worthlessness, meaninglessness, and emptiness. From a logical perspective, it is not difficult to understand that when one places others in an important position, one simultaneously places oneself in a position of unimportance and a lack of entitlement to treatment that is more than fair. One does not feel nourished in socializing, but rather, one nourishes others in a one-way direction with oneself. It is reasonable to conclude that such a relationship would not be of interest to anyone over the long term.
In response to the question, "I've become more self-absorbed. I wonder if that's selfish?," the answer depends on the definition of "selfish."
The question thus arises as to whether it is only by suppressing one's own feelings and needs and serving the feelings and needs of others that one can be called "unselfish." If this is indeed the case, then is the person one is helping, who would rather sacrifice one's feelings and needs so that one can receive assistance, also considered "selfish"?
I believe you have already provided the correct response.
The statement "This has also led to my growing inability to handle interpersonal relationships" appears to imply that one's inclination towards solitude is a primary factor contributing to difficulties in navigating interpersonal dynamics. However, it is necessary to ascertain whether this assertion is indeed valid.
It is also possible that other causal relationships may be at play. For example, could the "appeasing" interpersonal communication model be the actual reason for the observed decline in interpersonal relationship skills?
If one wishes to improve this, which causal relationship would one choose to address first?
[4] "In fact, I derive great pleasure from solitude, and my concerns primarily arise from certain passive social interactions." This sentiment and the notion that it may more strongly indicate an introverted or withdrawn disposition are to be celebrated. It is important to recognize and acknowledge the strength and capability of being able to enjoy solitude.
It is my view that solitude is a valuable skill, as everyone should be able to find ways to enjoy their lives. For some, socialising is a preferred activity. However, socialising relies on the presence of others to provide enjoyment, whereas solitude allows one to rely on oneself.
Have you identified this phenomenon? Is it not beneficial to be able to provide yourself with what you require, without relying on others?
One might be forgiven for suggesting that a celebration is in order.
With regard to passive socialization, it would be beneficial to inquire as to the underlying motivation for engaging in such activities. Additionally, it would be prudent to consider whether there are any potential consequences associated with a lack of participation in passive socialization.
"Perhaps upon receiving an answer, one may discover that participation in social activities has been "voluntarily chosen" rather than being a truly "passive" act. This indicates a reluctance to face a specific consequence of not engaging in social activities, which can be attributed to an underlying, unidentified need. It can be postulated that socialization is a means of satisfying this need."
One might therefore inquire whether the reluctance to engage in social activities is, in fact, a genuine need.
It is my sincere hope that you will receive a clear answer and that all of your concerns will dissipate.
This concludes my remarks. I extend my best wishes to you and the world at large.
Comments
I can totally relate to what you're going through. It's okay to enjoy your alone time and focus on personal growth. Maybe it's time to find a balance between solitude and socializing that feels right for you now.
It sounds like you've been really diving into your studies and selfdiscovery, which is awesome. Feeling that way about social interactions is natural when you're in a period of intense personal development. Perhaps try engaging with people who share your interests or academic pursuits.
Sometimes we outgrow certain social circles as we evolve. It's important to be true to yourself and follow your path. If you feel more aligned with your goals while studying, then perhaps seek out friendships within the academic community where you can grow together.
Feeling bored by social situations that no longer serve you can be a sign of growth. Embrace this new phase and don't worry too much about being selfish. It's all part of evolving. You might find new ways to connect with others that are more meaningful and fulfilling.