Good day,
I am writing in response to your question.
You have posed a thought-provoking question.
There is no definitive answer to this question, and individual perspectives may vary.
I would be pleased to discuss this with you further.
Correct delayed gratification does not result in negative feelings.
In my view, there is a widespread misunderstanding of delayed gratification.
As with the well-known marshmallow experiment, which has been used as a classic experiment on delayed gratification and has had a profound impact.
Subsequent research has identified a number of factors that influence the results.
To illustrate,
If we consider two children, one who is provided with a high level of material comfort and support, and the other who faces significant challenges in their relationship with their parents and a persistent concern about their basic needs being met,
A marshmallow experiment with these two children reveals that the latter will more readily opt for instant gratification.
It is understandable why some individuals prioritize immediate benefits.
There are also practical considerations.
We are discussing the general case here, and I believe that if delayed gratification is done correctly, it will not have a negative effect on people.
To illustrate,
Some younger individuals are not inclined to pursue gainful employment; they prefer to engage in leisure activities.
However, this is not currently feasible.
Therefore, I am obliged to attend work each day. Could relaxation after work be considered a form of delayed gratification?
Although there is no immediate gratification, working eight hours a day to provide for oneself financially and to feel valued is a more conducive approach to a better life.
It is important to consider the potential consequences of not working for a single day. While there may be an initial sense of satisfaction, it is likely that the long-term impact would be detrimental.
2. When is it appropriate to live in the present and when is it necessary to delay gratification?
My personal view is that it is possible to live in the present and to delay gratification simultaneously.
This may seem implausible at first.
However, it is.
It is a common misconception that living in the present means instant gratification.
The ability to live in the present is a state of mind.
I recently came across a fascinating book entitled The Game of Desire.
The book provides an illustrative example:
A smoker who has been smoking for a significant period of time may experience a sense of imminent discomfort if they do not smoke again within a short timeframe.
The author inquired if there were any particular circumstances in the subject's life where smoking was not permitted.
The patient indicated that when taking a long-distance flight,
The author proposes the existence of an inverted U-shaped curve.
For individuals with nicotine addiction, it is important to be aware that the half-life of nicotine is two hours. During this period, it is crucial to maintain focus and determination to overcome the urge to smoke.
Although these two hours may present a challenge, they offer a valuable opportunity to utilize mindfulness in a way that does not involve giving up craving, but rather, living in the present and experiencing one's own feelings.
By employing these techniques, the author has assisted numerous individuals in successfully quitting smoking and preventing relapse.
There is no inherent contradiction between living in the present and delayed gratification.
It is a common misconception that living in the present and delayed gratification are mutually exclusive.
What is required is not self-control, nor is it to refrain from action, but rather to gain clarity of vision.
It is important to be able to distinguish between the fleeting satisfactions we believe we are getting and whether or not they are actually beneficial to us.
3. Adapt your approach to suit your needs.
The choice between delaying gratification or seeking instant gratification is a personal one, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide which approach is best for them.
For instance, I opt for delayed gratification, which is a more comfortable decision for me.
To provide a straightforward example:
I find the process of answering questions to be challenging, particularly given the time constraints and the level of difficulty involved.
I tend to prefer viewing brief, tranquil videos.
Subsequently, I will view brief videos once I have completed the aforementioned tasks.
This approach has enabled me to complete the assigned task and derive satisfaction from it.
Please share these insights.
I hope that more colleagues will participate in this discussion.
Comments
It's true that delaying gratification can build character and resilience, but balance is key. We shouldn't ignore our mental health in the pursuit of longterm goals. Life's about enjoying the journey as much as the destination.
Living in the present moment can bring a lot of joy and reduce stress. I think it depends on the situation. If something brings you happiness without negative consequences, why wait? Embrace those moments of joy.
I believe it's important to set aside time for both. Delay gratification for big goals that require focus and dedication, while also allowing yourself small pleasures daily. This way, you're working towards your dreams while still enjoying life.
In this fastpaced world, we need strategies that work for us individually. Maybe start by identifying what truly matters to you. Once you know your priorities, it becomes clearer when to seize the day and when to plan for the future.
The choice between living in the moment and delaying gratification isn't always black and white. Sometimes they can coexist. For instance, savoring a cup of coffee or taking a walk can be immediate rewards that fuel us for bigger challenges ahead.