The topic of the original poster is quite interesting. I will contribute to the discussion by sharing some of my own views for the original poster's reference. As to whether my perspective can address the original poster's concerns, it is yet to be seen.
In order to respond to the question posed, it is first necessary to define what is meant by the term 'perception'. In the field of psychology, perception is understood to be the process through which individuals process information from their external environment. This process not only encompasses the reception of external stimuli, but also the interpretation and understanding of these stimuli. This definition can be extended to encompass the perception of external things by all living organisms, including animals and plants.
A narrow interpretation typically denotes an individual's comprehensive understanding of their immediate sensory experiences, encompassing visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic perceptions. To illustrate, consider the following scenario: an individual observes a roast suckling pig at their own domicile, perceives its golden-brown hue and aroma, and mentally conjures images evoking a sense of its palatability. This cognitive process may be prompted by a combination of factors, including prior exposure to similar stimuli, olfactory cues, or personal experiences with the dish in question. In this case, the individual's perception of the roast suckling pig is shaped by their existing knowledge and experiences, leading to a judgment of its identity as a roast suckling pig.
However, this momentary perception contains part of the past perception information. The subject has previously encountered the stimulus, whether visually, olfactorily, or gustatorily, and this experience is stored in memory. This stored memory allows the subject to more quickly interpret and process the information of the current stimulus, generating a new perception based on the original perception, thus reinforcing the subject's belief in their judgment.
Some posit that experience can be detrimental, while others maintain that it can be beneficial. Which viewpoint is more accurate? It is likely that the answer depends on the circumstances. The same experience can have markedly different consequences depending on the time, place, and individuals involved.
Similarly, if an individual is already satiated when presented with the image of the pig, it is unlikely that they will experience a desire to consume it, let alone do so immediately.
To illustrate, the concept of love as delineated by the original poster differs significantly between generations born after 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000. This discrepancy can be attributed, in part, to the influence of familial, social, and educational experiences at varying points in each age group's life, which has resulted in a spectrum of attitudes towards love. Even individuals of the same age cohort within the same era exhibit disparate perspectives on love.
To illustrate, during my third year of junior high school, I would deliver notes and engage in conversation with the girl I was interested in. However, I never held her hand, let alone embraced her or kissed her. I felt that such actions would be too bold and inappropriate. Nevertheless, one of my classmates and his girlfriend would engage in intimate behavior within the classroom after school, including hugging and kissing. I was able to observe this behavior because I happened to return to the classroom at that time. Upon seeing me, they immediately separated, but I could discern that they were visibly embarrassed.
In my day, parents and teachers taught us that it was not possible to fall in love at school. The rationale behind this was not made clear, but nevertheless, it was simply not permitted. Nevertheless, the confused and restless heart of adolescence could not be suppressed. It was still necessary to fall in love if one wanted to, but one had to be considerate of the time and place. This is still not outdated even in today's society. Some students may fall in love at school, but some may not. They may fall in love outside of school, not completely recklessly without considering the consequences. These ideas about "not being able to fall in love at school" can also be said to be part of the understanding of love.
With regard to the value of dating, it can be observed that in the present generation, dating and sexual intercourse generally occur after the age of adulthood, that is, in one's twenties. It is notable that there were also instances where students engaged in sexual intercourse while still in school. This occurred at different times and in different locations, and it was not possible to make a generalisation. This is also the case in the present day. The reason for this situation can be attributed to a sense of "awe" towards dating.
It is my personal opinion that love is a matter of great consequence that requires serious and responsible treatment. It is not a trivial matter or something to be taken lightly. Respect and value should be accorded to love and the person one loves. In contrast, some individuals become bored after engaging in sexual intercourse with their partner for a few days and subsequently terminate the relationship. This causes significant physical and psychological harm to the other person, yet they can simply leave without any responsibility or consideration of the other person's feelings. Such actions have resulted in tragic outcomes.
Such a relationship evidently lacks sufficient respect, seriousness, and responsibility, not only towards others but also towards oneself. As is widely recognized, an individual who is irresponsible and lacks commitment is likely to be viewed as a playboy, and as a result, may find it challenging to maintain relationships.
It is my personal belief that regardless of the era in question, even in the context of today's society, where materialism is pervasive and individuals are increasingly open about their romantic relationships, there will always be a subset of individuals who adhere to a correspondingly serious and respectful attitude towards romantic relationships. It is only through demonstrating sufficient respect, admiration, seriousness, and responsibility towards oneself and others, by adhering to the relevant rules and norms, and by refraining from actions that may negatively impact oneself, the other person, or others, that one can gain the corresponding respect, admiration, seriousness, and responsibility, and thereby achieve the satisfaction they seek.
Some individuals believe that pursuing frivolous and arbitrary actions and disregarding established norms can also result in the desired level of satisfaction. This is a valid perspective, yet it does not negate the possibility of attaining satisfaction through a more respectful, reverent, serious, and responsible approach. The contrast between these two attitudes will become evident over time. Treating a relationship with respect, reverence, seriousness, and responsibility tends to foster long-lasting and robust relationships.
Conversely, if there is not sufficient respect for a relationship and it is treated as a game to be played without being treated seriously and responsibly, it will be challenging to maintain a long-lasting relationship. This perception of the value of relationships will never become outdated and is a cognitive model that is consistent with the development of relationships, whether in the past, present, or future.
The definition of "outdated" is not a fixed concept; it is contingent upon the context and circumstances. To illustrate, in the past, people utilized firewood for cooking and heating. However, with the advent of natural gas and electricity, this practice has shifted. Nevertheless, in instances where there is a scarcity of natural gas and electricity, people resort to firewood as a substitute. This raises the question: Is the use of firewood for cooking and heating a form of obsolescence?
It is not uncommon for individuals at this age to have these thoughts and confusions. Their experiences, including what they have seen, heard, and been exposed to, contribute to this. At times, they may question certain concepts from the past, which is a normal and beneficial process. Without questioning, there would be no thinking, no learning, and no progress. For questioning these concepts, I commend the questioner.
Comments
Finding a counselor who is uptodate with the current generation's emotional dynamics can indeed be challenging. The post00s have grown up in a very different world, and their experiences may not align with older perspectives.
It's crucial for counselors to continuously update their knowledge and understanding of evolving social norms and behaviors. Many professionals do engage in ongoing education to stay relevant.
Young adults today are navigating relationships in an era dominated by social media and rapid communication, which can lead to more frequent but potentially less deep connections. This context is important for any counselor to understand.
If you're looking for a counselor who understands the modern dating landscape, consider seeking out those who specialize in youth or have a background in digital sociology. They might offer more pertinent advice.
The idea that all post2000 individuals have multiple relationships before 18 seems like a broad generalization. Every person's experience is unique, and it's important not to stereotype based on generational labels.