From your questions and your description, it appears that you are particularly clear about your desires and are also acutely aware of your personal boundaries. You demonstrate an ability to halt your own actions when necessary. This indicates that you have well-defined objectives, clear boundaries, and a sense of control over your actions.
As an illustration, you referenced in your text that
In particular, the desire to be seen, responded to, and recognized.
You become aware of the potential danger and choose to cease the action.
Once more, you ceased your actions.
Or, alternatively, one might posit that the individual still experiences a sense of danger and thus chooses to cease the activity in question.
Additionally, the subject reported feelings of addiction and subsequent cessation of the behavior in question.
Subsequently, we will methodically deconstruct your textual expression, focusing on the three keywords [need, deep chat, and danger], in order to assist you in organizing your thoughts.
1. A systematic analysis of the emotional needs and the means of articulating them.
In particular, the subject expressed a desire to be seen, responded to, and recognized.
[Being seen] – In essence, when we express the desire to be seen, we are not seeking to be observed while engaging in a particular action, but rather to be seen in a state of emotional and inner need.
In an intimate relationship, the reason why one party is not perceived is often because the other party is only listening to the verbal content of the interaction and engaging in discussion about the topic at hand, but neglecting to consider the emotional context and the emotional needs of the other person.
This kind of interaction is not particularly demanding of a partner and is also a common occurrence in most marital relationships.
There are numerous potential explanations, including the extent to which the problem-solving model acquired in the other person's family of origin is being replicated in the current intimate relationship. Additionally, it is important to ascertain whether the other person is adept at articulating their emotions and inner needs.
One must also consider whether the other party is capable of understanding the emotions and needs expressed by the individual in question. It is also important to determine whether the other party is genuinely uninterested or if they are deliberately avoiding the issue.
Such responses are contingent upon the specific circumstances and factors involved.
In order to express one's emotions and emotional needs in an intimate relationship, it is possible to attempt to communicate with the other person directly, stating, "Something has happened between us, and I would like to discuss it with you, but it is not about the event itself; it is about my emotions and needs. Therefore, I would like us to set aside our views on the event for a while, and allow me to share my emotions and feelings with you."
The phrase "there are huge differences in character" in fact conceals a multitude of subtle nuances in the underlying causes.
[Responded] indicates whether the other person has provided feedback and, moreover, at what pace.
Indeed, it has an effect on one's emotional state.
Similarly, a lack of response may be indicative of a shift in the other person's interest or a lack of availability to respond in a timely manner.
Alternatively, are you dissatisfied because the other person has not grasped your central argument? Or is the other person evading the crucial issues and engaging in other topics?
It is important to note that different situations require different responses.
[Being recognized] – this may reflect a lack of confidence in oneself, a need for affirmation or recognition from others, or it may express one's hope that the other person can see one's affirmation and efforts. The other person's feedback will provide a sense of worth, while being unrecognized will result in a strong sense of frustration and worthlessness. It may also be interpreted in other ways, so one can look within oneself to ascertain one's true feelings.
The communication and expression of these emotional feelings can be conveyed through the aforementioned direct and clear expressions.
2. Could you please clarify what is meant by the term "excessive"?
As you mentioned at the conclusion of our discussion,
In what ways might the transition be made more comfortable, so that it is not so challenging?
What is meant by "this transition"? Does it signify that being in a different location represents a period of transition?
The information provided in the text is insufficient to fully comprehend the situation; however, this crucial piece of information is essential to understanding the context.
Upon reading this sentence, one might easily associate it with the following situation: the couple has encountered a situation and is unsure of how to explain it clearly. The individual in question actually requires the opportunity to engage in a deep conversation with their wife. However, due to personality differences and the fact that communicating from a distance is not as convenient as being together, progress has been slow.
Furthermore, your efforts to enhance the intimacy with your wife have not yielded the desired results, leading to feelings of disappointment and distress.
It is therefore apparent that you are seeking assistance in analysing the most effective means of enhancing communication with your wife and resolving the issues that have arisen between you. However, it is unclear whether this is an accurate representation of the situation.
You are endeavoring to enhance your intimacy with your wife, with the expectation that she will discern and acknowledge this effort.
It may be beneficial to inquire of your wife whether she has perceived any alterations in the quality of the relationship. Despite your efforts to enhance intimacy, she may not have discerned the changes.
At times, I am uncertain about my feelings, which presents a significant challenge. Consequently, I would appreciate the opportunity to engage in further dialogue when time allows. It is my hope that you will be able to discern my efforts, and I value your feedback.
In light of these considerations, it seems reasonable to conclude that the topics of deep conversations with others, whether offline, online, or with a therapist, are all related to the intimacy between you and your wife.
This leads to the question of whether this action can be interpreted as an attempt to "deeply discuss" through different channels in order to practice one's own expression and communication methods. It also raises the issue of whether this is an example of preparing the groundwork and setting the stage for a deep discussion with one's wife.
3. You referenced the concept of "dangerous" on three occasions and ceased your actions, and on one occasion, you alluded to the sensation of addiction. Could you elaborate on the specific connotations of the term "dangerous"?
In addition, this is supported by what you subsequently stated.
The primary objective is to enhance the level of intimacy with his wife.
How do you perceive this potential danger?
The potential risks associated with engaging in deep conversations offline may stem from the sense of being understood, seen, responded to, and recognized when one confides in others.
Thus, one may posit that there is an emotional inclination towards the listener. Furthermore, it can be hypothesized that deep conversations with other individuals, as opposed to one's partner, may serve to exacerbate the existing differences or cracks in one's intimacy with one's wife.
The potential risks associated with engaging in deep online chats can be understood as follows: these conversations may evoke underlying concerns and anxieties that individuals may be hesitant to confront. This could lead to a reluctance to continue the conversation and a lack of clarity on how to address these issues.
The potential risks associated with engaging in deep conversations with a listener can be understood as follows: the experience of being seen, understood, and recognized may foster an addictive dependency on such communication. Concerns arise that if this pattern persists, it may impede the ability to engage in meaningful, intimate communication with one's partner, potentially leading to further deterioration in the quality of the relationship. Consequently, I chose to cease this behavior.
Moreover, all three types of in-depth discourse evoke an addictive sensation.
This addictive sensation is, in fact, the sensation of having one's needs met.
Thus, on the one hand, there is the perception of being unable to fulfill one's wife's self-needs, and on the other hand, there is the experience of pleasure when one's own needs are met. This creates a desire to engage in deep conversations with others to obtain emotional gratification when one's wife's self-needs remain unmet.
4. What is the precise nature of the discrepancy in personality? Is the divergence in personality truly a profound rift in communication or a mutual lack of emotional fulfillment?
Your ability to discern potential dangers and act accordingly demonstrates caution and restraint. Furthermore, your inclination to proactively identify solutions to challenges suggests a proclivity for optimism and initiative.
The most significant challenge arises from the fact that the two individuals are situated in disparate locations and possess distinct personalities. To what extent do these factors contribute to the problem?
These factors are not addressed in the text.
The act of being in different locations has the potential to impact the timeliness of communication and the transmission of emotions during communication and interaction. When emotions are encountered in each other, the ability to provide direct comfort through body movements is limited in comparison to when communication is face-to-face. This is an area where communication in different locations has the greatest impact on the intimacy of communication.
Even when separated, it is possible to respond to each other with words that express one's true feelings. While the power of words may not be as tactile as physical actions, they can nevertheless touch each other's hearts.
For example, one might express it thus: "I recognize that it is challenging for you to be apart from me. Despite my desire for you to comprehend me, perceive me, and concur with me, I may not have been as capable of doing so for you as I would have liked."
Despite the imperfections in our relationship and the lack of an optimal approach, I am committed to enhancing our bond. While this may not entirely address the discomfort associated with physical separation, it can provide insight into my depth of affection.
For your reference, the principle of expression is mutual understanding. Initially, it is recommended to endeavor to comprehend and empathize with the other individual. Subsequently, the other individual will be more inclined to attempt to comprehend and empathize with us. Additionally, honesty and attitude can significantly enhance an intimate relationship.
The question then arises as to how to deal with personality differences.
Could you please clarify what you mean by "a huge personality difference"?
Given your positive, optimistic, proactive, and communicative disposition, along with your emotional sensitivity, capacity for restraint, and awareness,
In the event of significant discrepancies, can the personality of your wife be discerned from this information?
She exhibits a more coarse characterization, displaying a tendency toward directness and assertiveness in her verbal expressions. Additionally, she may not demonstrate the same degree of emotional sensitivity as others.
Is it always your preference to resolve issues without contemplating the emotional implications?
If one can ascertain the character traits of one's spouse, it is akin to exploring the unknown in a given situation based on the known conditions of the other party when solving problems.
It is accurate to conclude that personality differences can give rise to discrepancies in behavior, thought processes, and value systems between partners. However, it is not inevitable that differences in values between partners will result in arguments or conflicts.
It is, in fact, a misrepresentation of the truth to suggest that differences in opinion inevitably lead to arguments or conflicts. A more accurate expression may be that the reason for such disagreements is that we have different ideas, but we definitely want to convince the other person to agree with our ideas.
If we can endeavor to affirm or comprehend the aspects of the other person's viewpoint with which we concur, while also articulating the elements of our divergence, it is our hope that the other person will alter their stance and engage in reflection and personal experience.
In lieu of attempting to persuade the other party, it is possible to gain first-hand experience of the differences in question. This approach is likely to result in a reduction in the likelihood of arguments, and instead may facilitate mutual understanding and trust.
It is therefore relatively straightforward to communicate about personality differences or to express needs. Initially, it is important to be curious about the other person's mode and channel of communication. This allows for the subsequent adjustment to each other's channel, which in turn facilitates a kind of resonance.
This process may still be somewhat arduous, but as the adage suggests, if partners seek to enhance their mutual understanding and improve their intimacy, the most straightforward and direct approach is to embrace each other's differences with curiosity.
The resolution of problems in intimate relationships is best achieved within the context of that relationship.
Such profound discourse does not inherently pose a threat to the relationship; rather, it fortifies the foundation of intimacy.
My name is Bo, sir.
Comments
I understand your need to be seen and acknowledged. It seems like you've been searching for the right way to connect, but each attempt has left you feeling unsafe or uncomfortable. Maybe it's time to focus on building a safer space within yourself before reaching outwards.
Finding the right balance between connection and personal safety can be challenging. You've tried various methods, from offline to online interactions, even paid services, and group chats. Perhaps now is the moment to seek professional guidance to navigate these feelings of danger and addiction while working on your relationship with your wife.
It's tough when you're trying to deepen a relationship despite significant personality differences and physical distance. Have you considered setting small, manageable goals with your wife? Sometimes progress feels slow, but even tiny steps forward can make a difference over time.
Your journey to find meaningful connections has been intense, filled with starts and stops. Now that you're focusing on your marriage, maybe incorporating shared activities or interests could help bridge the gap between you and your wife, despite the challenges.
Feeling comfortable and reducing suffering might come from embracing vulnerability and honesty in your communication with your wife. Expressing your needs and listening to hers can create a foundation for understanding and intimacy, even if it takes time and effort.