Good morning, Thank you for your question.
In general, being good has its advantages. It allows one to win some small or big honors and achieve results in areas where one excels. However, there are also disadvantages to being good. Interpersonal relationships may become challenging to navigate because of one's abilities. Most people prefer to interact with individuals who are similarly skilled and may find it difficult to connect with those who are more capable than they are.
From this vantage point, it appears that excellence can be both beneficial and detrimental when viewed in relation to others. However, is it necessary to rank or honor abilities for them to be recognized?
For example, if I am ranked first in business ability in an average company, does that prove that I am very capable? If I am ranked last in the best company in the world, does that prove that I am weak?
If the company does not engage in performance evaluations, does that mean I lack business proficiency? My proficiency remains unchanged regardless of the company I work for. My proficiency is not contingent on the company or other individuals.
Another example is the size of an egg. It depends on what it is compared to. Compared to a mung bean, it is large; compared to a basketball, it appears small.
However, an egg remains an egg, and its ability is not diminished simply by being compared to another entity. It can still hatch chicks or be used in a culinary preparation.
Our abilities can be ranked among those of our colleagues, but this does not imply any direct correlation with them. Therefore, being "good" simply means that I am more proficient in a particular skill than someone else, not that I am inherently superior to them in all respects.
It is irrelevant whether another individual outperforms me in this area or is less proficient than me. Being proficient in a particular area simply means that I am more skilled than someone else, not that I am more skilled than someone else in all areas.
It is not a matter of being outstanding, but rather of comparing oneself with others. If one does not compare oneself with others, one will not have any problems. It is simply a matter of doing one's own thing. Making incremental improvements on a daily basis is an excellent way to be outstanding.
There is no correlation between excellence and comfort.


Comments
I totally get what you mean. It feels like somewhere along the line, society twisted confidence into arrogance and people started seeing selfappreciation as a confusing or even offputting trait.
It's strange to me too. Praising our own achievements shouldn't be confusing; it should be natural. We're often so quick to celebrate others but hesitate to do the same for ourselves.
This is something I've noticed more and more. People are baffled by straightforward selfrecognition. It's as if acknowledging your own strengths makes you less relatable or humble.
Why has it become this way? Recognizing our excellence is part of personal growth. It's important to own our successes without feeling like we're causing confusion or boasting.