Good evening.
Your question was succinct. Upon seeing the title, I was inclined to contribute my limited insights. However, after reading your question, I contemplated whether the various teachers who responded to these queries had each recommended a specific course of action, such as systemic family therapy, Gestalt therapy, postmodernism, focus solution short-term therapy, psychodynamics, behaviorist therapy, human-centered therapy, existential therapy, Adlerian therapy, art therapy, dance therapy, and so forth. Additionally, I considered the potential implications of other approaches, such as O-card, sandplay, play, graffiti, image matches, and so on. Would your anxiety levels be heightened if these were included in the recommendations?
Moreover, the individuals responding to the queries are presumed to be engaged in the field of psychology, thereby exhibiting a certain degree of professional expertise.
What would be the optimal choice in this situation? Would the addition of a few more items result in a more favorable outcome, or would it exacerbate the anxiety?
In essence, the question at hand is not whether one should pursue cognitive therapy or hypnotherapy, but rather, what specific approach should be adopted and whose counsel should be heeded. Should one's own inner voice be the primary guide, or should external input from others be given greater weight?
Naturally, when making a decision, it is common practice to seek the opinions of others, particularly those with relevant experience. After all, the experience of those who have been in a similar situation can help us to avoid making some misguided decisions.
However, personal experience is merely that: personal. What is suitable for one individual may not be for another. Even if there is a general consensus, such as that hard work leads to success, not everyone will succeed if they work hard. What if one takes the wrong path?
It can be reasonably deduced that experience and advice, even if they have been tried and tested by many people, may not necessarily be suitable for everyone. Therefore, it is not feasible to apply other people's experience directly. To put it in fashionable terms, it is necessary to "sinicize" it, for example, to make it Marxist, local, etc.
Such advice should be tailored to the specific usage scenarios and conditions in question.
In light of the aforementioned considerations, it is evident that while external counsel can be beneficial, its applicability hinges on the individual circumstances. Imitation without adaptation is not a viable approach.
Naturally, I am also offering counsel, which you may choose to accept or reject in whole or in part. The decision is yours to make.
We will now address an even more pivotal question: who is responsible for determining one's area of study? It is evident that the ultimate decision rests with the individual student.
Ultimately, it is the learner who is responsible for their own education, who bears the financial burden, and who will utilize the knowledge gained in the future. As adults, we all have different paths to follow. In matters of learning, it is possible to follow the majority, but the decision ultimately rests with the individual.
It is imperative to recognize that the decision is ultimately yours. No external force can compel you to make a choice.
This brings us to the third question: Why does the advice of others cause such internal conflict?
One might inquire as to the potential consequences of declining the counsel of another individual. What are your thoughts on this matter?
One might inquire as to the source of this internal conflict.
These questions are arguably the most significant: Why do you attach such significance to the opinions of others? Are you concerned about the potential of disappointing others or falling short of their expectations?
This question can only be answered by the individual in question. Should they be able to find the answer and implement the necessary improvements, they will be better able to listen to their heart and be true to themselves.
It is recommended that you consult with a counselor.
I am a psychological counselor who experiences periods of depression and optimism. I extend my love and appreciation to the world.
Comments
I can totally relate to feeling overwhelmed with choices. It sounds like you're already on a good path with basic hypnosis and now exploring psychology. Maybe start by looking into what cognitivebehavioral therapy involves; it's quite popular for its practical approach.
It's great that you're thinking critically about your skills. Hypnosis can be a powerful tool, but as you said, it's not a cureall. Perhaps consider how integrating elements of both hypnosis and psychology could enhance your practice and help clients more holistically.
I understand your confusion. Psychology is vast, but starting with cognitivebehavioral therapy might be beneficial since it has a strong evidence base. You don't have to choose just one path; combining different therapies could be effective too.
Your hesitation makes sense. Why not explore the fundamentals of psychology first? Once you have a solid grounding in theories like those from Freud or cognitivebehavioral therapy, you'll be better equipped to decide if advanced hypnosis is right for you.
You bring up a valid point about hypnosis not solving everything. Learning the basics of psychology could offer you a broader perspective. Each theory, like cognitivebehavioral therapy or Shuntan therapy, brings something unique to the table, so perhaps try them out one by one.