Why is it so easy for bad people to thrive, and do good people always get their just rewards?

It is evident that you have numerous inquiries pertaining to the concepts of good and evil, beliefs, and related matters. This concise text addresses a multitude of questions regarding the nature of these concepts, their underlying motivations, and the use of question marks.

Let us begin with a brief examination of the literal meaning of the term.

Those who engage in immoral behavior are so labeled because they exhibit a lack of moral discernment. They may be more self-centered and less concerned about the feelings of others, which makes them prone to engage in wrongdoing. It is not always the case that those who engage in immoral behavior suffer the consequences of their actions.

Those who are considered to be good people often exhibit a strict and demanding sense of morality, similar to that of an individual who adheres to traditional values and is cautious about causing harm to others, even if it may result in personal detriment. This is merely one perspective on the matter.

There are numerous categories of individuals who may be considered "good," and it is not necessarily the case that such individuals will be rewarded.

What constitutes goodness? What is the nature of evil?

Indeed, there is no definitive definition, and individuals will inevitably arrive at their own conclusions. Moreover, it is crucial to recognize that each of us is inherently a complex blend of both virtuous and malevolent traits.

The world is not comprised of absolutes; rather, it is a complex tapestry of nuances and shades of gray. Humans, too, are not monochromatic beings; they possess a multitude of traits and characteristics.

Consequently, it is futile to attempt to differentiate between good and evil. It is simply the case that there is a vast spectrum of moral ambiguity, and there are no absolute good or bad individuals.

In Chinese philosophy, the concept of the "greatest reward" is a fundamental tenet. One such principle is the idea that the greatest reward God can bestow upon a person is to make them a good person.

My greater concern is the motivation behind your question. Have you experienced hurt caused by your own actions as a result of your adherence to a moral code?

In my view, a good person is someone who does not harm others, does not force others to act in a certain way, acts in accordance with their own moral code, does not seek external validation, is not excessively self-critical, and does not impose their own standards of goodness on others. I do not, however, expect others to adhere to these standards. Instead, I believe that individuals should be true to themselves, embracing their own unique set of strengths, weaknesses, kindness, and principles.

As a psychological counselor, I am persistent and philosophical, occasionally motivated and positive. I extend my love to the world and to all of humanity.

Hello, I'm Gu Yi. I'm a modest and consistent person.

A white horse isn't really a horse, right? It's a pretty deep question, isn't it?

How do we know when something is good or evil?

Many people wonder if good people get good rewards. What is a good person? Are they the people who have made an impact in China?

What about the good people around us that we've identified ourselves? Then, what about people in China who've touched the hearts of the general public with their extraordinary deeds? They've been seen as good people for decades of unwavering dedication. But what about their own families?

We all have limited energy.

So how are we supposed to tell the difference between good and evil? The fact is, things are often more complex than they seem. So it seems that there is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question asked by the original poster, because the standards for this matter vary from one situation to the next. Unlike multiple-choice questions, which have a required option, there is never a standard answer in life.

The fact that there isn't one clear answer doesn't mean there isn't one. In "The Distant Savior," Rui Xiaodan asked Ding Yuanying, "What kind of person is Ye Xiaoming?" Ding Yuanying replied, "He's a good person, but that's not enough to say he's the best."

So, when we evaluate someone, there are lots of factors to consider. Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching says, "You can talk about the way, but it's not the way itself. You can name the way, but it's not the name." So, as long as our code of conduct aligns with the way, that's enough.

Tao is the way things are.

Faith is a tricky topic.

Faith is a person's spiritual world. Buddhist believers will kneel towards the place of pilgrimage in their hearts during major festivals, and some people may even trek for years ahead. In the process, they may experience a lot, from material deprivation to people's strange looks to the hardship of trekking. Things that seem difficult to us can be swept aside in their hearts because they have their own beliefs.

So, what is faith and what should we believe in? As proletarians, we can't answer that for you. What we can tell you is that your understanding of the spiritual world, your understanding of the value of life, and your sense of self will give you some kind of answer. This is another question you've raised: "Many people in the world are selling their own organizations."

The ability to sell is based on recognizing your own emotional value, moral value, and so on.

Faith is a big topic and a process of philosophical speculation. To gain a comprehensive understanding and synthesis, we need to combine our knowledge, experience, and personal history. If you are a mortal, don't add shackles to yourself based on whether you think you're a good person or a bad person.

I'll let you in on a secret: it's not that easy to be a bad guy because you have to pass the test of conscience.

Your thinking is excellent, and I look forward to seeing you make a breakthrough soon.

Wishing you the best.

Hello,

Host:

I'm Zeng Chen, a Heart Exploration coach. I've read your post and I see you're looking for opinions from the group.

This will give you, the host, a more well-rounded view of the issue.

Next, I'll share my observations and thoughts in the post, which might help you see this issue from a different angle.

1. What makes a good person and what makes a bad person?

In the post, the host talks about why it's so easy to be a bad person but so hard to be a good one. It's an interesting question with no simple answer.

Because there's no clear-cut definition of good and evil. From this perspective, this person may be a good person.

But then again, he might be a bad guy.

Someone I'd consider a good person might be seen as bad by him. It's a bit confusing when you think about it like that.

I think it might be down to the original poster's own subjective judgement.

2. Why is it so tough to be a good person, but so easy to be a bad one?

Why is it so tough to be a good person, but so easy to be a bad one? I get it. It's because of limiting beliefs.

When we define ourselves as a good person or want to be a good person, we'll be limited by the standards of a good person. As we said before, there's no unified standard for everyone.

We all have different standards. What if these two standards conflict?

Then we're back to square one. Let's take the good guy in life, for example.

A good person may often help others out of good intentions, or even at the expense of their own interests. So, from the perspective of the person being helped, they see him as a good person.

But from the perspective of his partner and family, he's seen as a "bad person" because he makes sacrifices for them. In some ways, he sacrifices the interests of his partner and family. So what does he do when he advertises himself as a "good person"? And when the good guy helps others, some people may think he's a good person.

Some people might not see it that way. They might think that because you always help him, others cannot grow.

So, there are a lot of standards and a lot of perspectives for a good person. But there aren't so many standards for a "bad person," who may act more from their own perspective and their own interests.

He doesn't concern himself with these standards and beliefs.

Then we're not constrained by these rules. We'll naturally be more "free."

It's tough to be a good person, but it's easy to be a bad person. At the end of the day, it's still about perception.

3. Think for yourself instead of letting others define you.

It's worth considering that whether we're good or bad, many of us would probably prefer to be less good. What does this mean?

We can try to take care of our own needs first and be a little "selfish." After all, taking care of ourselves well is the only way to be able to take care of others well.

This is a win-win approach. The interesting thing about this approach is that when we first satisfy ourselves, we may come across as the "bad guy" in other people's eyes. But when we satisfy ourselves, enrich our hearts, fill our hearts with love, and even have extra love, and when we give the extra love to others, then at that time we will come across as the "good guy" in other people's eyes.

But from a psychological standpoint, whether or not we're seen as "bad" or "good" by others, it's all part of who we are. So, why do we need to separate these things?

Why do we put ourselves in boxes, good or bad, and then limit ourselves to fit that definition?

I think we can look at it from a richer perspective. We use cognition, not the other way around.

I hope these ideas will give the host a little inspiration and help.

In any given society, there will be a proportion of individuals who can be considered "good" and a proportion who can be considered "bad." Additionally, there will be a significant number of individuals who are neither good nor bad, but rather passive observers. To illustrate, consider the following scenario: On a bus, an individual with a proclivity for misbehavior feels that the bus driver is driving erratically and strikes the driver with his foot. If the majority of observers remain passive, it could potentially lead to safety concerns.

If a benevolent individual offers assistance to an elderly person and transports them to the hospital for emergency treatment, but instead of expressing gratitude, the elderly person attempts to extort the individual, then the benevolent individual may be subjected to intimidation and harassment. This could potentially lead to a decline in the number of benevolent individuals in the future. Furthermore, the likelihood of an elderly person being assisted in the event of an emergency will diminish, and the optimal time for rescue will be delayed.

The question thus arises as to why those of a malevolent disposition are so readily rewarded for their virtuous actions.

It is frequently asserted that virtuous individuals will be duly rewarded. However, this does not always prove to be the case.

The question of whether good people will be rewarded remains unanswered.

The term "good people" is open to interpretation.

Those who engage in antisocial or criminal activities are often referred to as "bad guys."

One can discern their own reservations regarding the recompense of virtuous individuals. It is conceivable that this is a consequence of the collective anticipation for the virtuous and their actions, with the aspiration of fostering a more constructive social milieu.

The question of whether good people will be rewarded remains an open one, and requires a case-by-case analysis.

A person of good character will receive recognition if they interact with another individual of similarly commendable qualities.

The assertion that virtuous individuals are not rewarded is, in essence, an act of extortion.

It is a commonly held belief that good people will be rewarded, yet it is challenging to ascertain with certainty what the outcome will be. This phenomenon can be better understood through a dialectical lens. When one's own survival is already being compromised, individuals may resort to any means necessary to ensure their continued existence.

It is not uncommon for individuals with benevolent intentions to be exploited by those who seek to take advantage of them. There are numerous instances, both online and in real life, where individuals with good intentions have been subjected to blackmail and other forms of exploitation.

An individual's capacity to act as a good person is influenced by their personal values and moral standards. Those who possess a robust sense of morality are more likely to engage in benevolent actions. Conversely, there are individuals who remain apathetic when confronted with the needs of those in distress.

The act of being a good person and performing good deeds is not contingent upon receiving any form of compensation or reward. These actions are undertaken with the conviction that they are meaningful and worthwhile. However, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of such actions. If being a good person and performing good deeds makes one vulnerable to blackmail and fraud, the cost may be too high and it may prove challenging to continue.

The requirements for a good person remain subjective and vary from individual to individual. Sometimes, it is merely about expressing benevolent sentiments, harboring benevolent intentions, and engaging in benevolent actions while refraining from causing harm to others. This may be a sufficient criterion for identifying a good person. With regard to the challenges associated with being a good person, it is yet to be seen whether the material and spiritual needs of individuals can be harmoniously balanced. The passage of time will reveal the answer, and time itself will establish the standard. Best wishes.

Please clarify the question.