Hello, host!
I think your questions are great and I'm happy to share some of my thoughts with you.
The relationship between idols and their fans is a bit like a dialectic.
First of all, I think an idol becomes an idol because they're in a group with a bunch of fans. We call that a "fan club." The idol's identity is tied to the fan club. You could even say the idol exists because of the fans.
The quarrels and conflicts between the fan groups are basically confrontations between the two groups. Even if the idol doesn't want to get involved, they can't stay out of it.
2. One person's behavior can quickly become a group problem.
Sometimes, fans' behavior is pretty personal, but for various reasons, it can easily turn into a group problem.
First, because fan groups are so cohesive and share common interests and beliefs, they're quick to accept and support individuals. This can lead to group behavior.
Second, people with ulterior motives can easily exploit the personal actions of fans. In particular, once they are labeled as "fans of XX idol" and exaggerated and spread, they will set off a storm, instantly turning into a fight between the two fan groups, and the situation is likely to intensify.
3. When it comes to group behavior, it's hard to stay out of it.
When some fans act in a way that affects the whole group, it can have a knock-on effect on everyone involved.
In his book The Crowd, Le Bon talks about the main characteristics of a group.
First, there's impulsiveness and fickleness.
They're also susceptible to suggestion and gullible.
The third thing to look out for is emotional exaggeration and simplicity.
And finally, we have bigotry and authoritarianism.
And finally, a low IQ.
At this point, the fan group has become a group of people with "simply exaggerated emotions, impulsiveness, paranoia, arbitrariness, and a lack of rational thinking ability." Based on the influence of these emotions, the other fan group, which is fighting against them, naturally directs their attacks at the most important core of this group—the idol—to deal a painful blow to the other side.
This is basically online violence.
Ultimately, the idol has very little control over the group's actions. It's challenging for an individual to influence the direction of group behavior. This is why it's not uncommon for idols to be implicated because of some of their fans.


Comments
It's true that fans have their own agency and should be accountable for their actions. The idol's role is to entertain and inspire, not to manage or control the behavior of individuals who follow them. We can't expect celebrities to take responsibility for what others do in their name.
Fans acting out or getting into arguments isn't something the idol has control over. People need to understand that being a fan doesn't excuse bad behavior. Everyone must stand by their own choices and actions. It's important to separate the adoration for an artist from the personal conduct of the admirers.
When fans cause trouble, it's unfair to shift that burden onto the idol. If we allow this, it could lead to a situation where anyone could act up and claim to be a fan, which would be unreasonable. Celebrities shouldn't have to suffer for the misconduct of a few.
Ultimately, the idolfan relationship is built on mutual respect. While idols may influence, they don't direct the lives of their fans. Each person is responsible for their own actions, and that's a principle we should all stand by, regardless of how much we admire someone.
The idea that an idol should take responsibility for their fans' actions sets a dangerous precedent. It undermines personal accountability and could lead to exploitation. It's crucial for fans to remember that their behavior reflects on themselves, not just on the stars they look up to.