The questioner's statement indicates that this kind of person tends to conceal their true selves, particularly when attempting to interact with others. During conversations, they often circumvent direct disclosure of their preferences, instead focusing on gathering information or steering the conversation towards their desired outcomes. They rarely take the initiative to explicitly state their intentions.
What can be said about this kind of person? Does this imply that they are intelligent and possess a high IQ, and that they will conceal their true intentions?
Or am I simply lacking in intelligence for being unable to discern his intentions? I am uncertain as to how I should interact with this particular individual.
The objective is to ascertain how one might interact with such an individual. One may either feel at ease or uneasy in the presence of such a person.
The questioner's feelings of helplessness and confusion are evident in their words. While I admire the skill of engaging in such a conversation, I also feel suffocated, as I believe I could be easily tricked and taken advantage of by this individual. The confusion arises from a sense of loss of control over the other person, and thus, it can be viewed from two broad perspectives:
⭐️1. Adopt the perspective of the other person
I previously listened to a book about the psychology of strangers, which proved to be an enlightening experience. The book's central premise is the importance of adopting the mindset of a stranger in order to gain a deeper understanding of their perspective.
Despite the fact that the content of the book is, for the most part, already well-known, it is nevertheless the case that few people will point this out.
The book's most intriguing proposition is as follows:
The majority of individuals believe they possess the ability to accurately discern the intentions and motivations of others.
The majority of individuals believe that it is impossible to ascertain another person's thoughts and intentions.
The rationale behind any given action or utterance is seldom straightforward.
In point of fact, each individual is constituted by a complex array of genetic material, growth environment, educational background, past experiences, and a plethora of additional factors. The words, actions, and decisions of a person are the consequence of a sophisticated interplay of superimposed factors.
It is similarly unfeasible to assert that a singular causal factor can be identified as the sole determinant of a given outcome.
It is therefore not unusual that the questioner stated that he is unable to ascertain his purpose. At best, inferences can be made based on the questioner's understanding and past observations.
However, it is important to note that individuals are inherently independent variables, and thus, even if an inference is made, the resulting conclusion may not be accurate.
It is impossible to ascertain the entirety of an individual's life experiences, as they may be unable or unwilling to divulge certain information or may have forgotten significant events.
Consequently, it is possible to consider alternative methods of interpreting his actions while simultaneously acknowledging and accepting the possibility of remaining uncertain about his intentions.
Naturally, a prerequisite to this is a genuine desire to ascertain his intentions.
Those who direct their attention inward are aware that expending effort to comprehend others is a taxing endeavor.
It is important to note that individuals tend to adhere to their own patterns of thinking and decision-making. There is no absolute right or wrong in this regard; it is a matter of personal preference.
The questioner should consider the various avenues for gaining insight into the other person's character.
For example, one might inquire directly about the matter at hand during the course of the conversation. Given that the other person is adept at engaging in small talk and the questioner also feels at ease conversing with them, it is likely that the other person will be able to respond to such an inquiry.
Should he respond in a forthright manner, he will have assuaged the questioner's concerns. Conversely, should he eschew the pivotal matters and concentrate on the inconsequential, the questioner may persist in the endeavour to ascertain whether he can sustain the conversation indefinitely.
One can observe the subject while simultaneously experiencing a sense of ease.
⭐️2. Adopt a perspective that is informed by your own experiences and circumstances.
As indicated by the questioner, this individual has the capacity to evoke feelings of comfort and discomfort.
It is, in fact, possible for the questioner to observe the same person, the same words, and the same actions. Some individuals will experience feelings of discomfort or comfort, while others will remain unaffected.
▶️ How is such a distinction established?
1. Those who are immune to all harm ensure that they take care of their obligations.
2. The words and actions of another person are beyond our control; however, we retain the ability to choose our emotional response.
3. It is advisable to avoid taking other people's actions and opinions too seriously, while also avoiding taking oneself too lightly.
Attention directed back toward oneself can engender a sense of empowerment and control. It is important to recognize that we do not possess the authority or obligation to alter the words and actions of others.
It is important to note that the individual in question is not under your guardianship. Consequently, your concerns regarding his character and values are misguided. Such concerns are not only exhausting, but also unlikely to be appreciated by the individual in question. It would be more beneficial for you to consider ways of improving yourself and fostering your own happiness. It may be helpful to reflect on the types of individuals you find most compatible and who contribute to your sense of relaxation and happiness. It would be beneficial for you to prioritize spending time with such individuals.
One may choose to either avoid individuals and circumstances that elicit discomfort or to allow them to be themselves. The optimal approach is to act as an impartial observer, avoiding the trap of becoming preoccupied with their actions.
The brain functions similarly to the body in that it is a tool. As it is used more frequently, the thinking that occurs as a result becomes more automatic and habitual. This thinking is not always wise or rational.
The same can be said of our habitual actions. Some of these are neither necessary nor useful; for example, crossing one's legs.
In light of these considerations, the questioner may also wish to examine these issues carefully: which are necessary, which are not; which are within one's control, which are not.
Frequently, anger, depression, and entanglement are manifestations of self-punishment for perceived misdeeds of others. Given the inability to alter the actions of others, the only viable recourse is to modify one's own behavior. At best, one can exert influence over others through one's own actions.
Following a comprehensive analysis of the issue at hand, it is evident that the questioner has reached a personal conclusion and a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
Furthermore, it is my hope that my response will provide the inquirer with inspiration and assistance.
I extend my best wishes to you.
Comments
They seem to have a unique way of engaging with others, carefully navigating conversations to understand people better while keeping their own intentions under wraps. It's intriguing and perhaps it's not about being clever or having a high IQ, but more about being cautious and strategic in social interactions.
Interacting with someone like this can be quite a challenge. It might help to be straightforward and set clear boundaries for the conversation. Being genuine and showing interest in mutual exchange rather than onesided probing can create a more balanced dynamic.
Sometimes such individuals are just trying to protect themselves or feel out the environment before opening up. Offering a space where they feel safe and respected might encourage them to be more open over time. Patience and consistency in your approach can go a long way in building trust.