A system notification has been received, inviting a response. Gratitude is extended for the opportunity to communicate through text.
From the comments, it appears that the questioner is more concerned about the fact that their mode of communication is not understood or accepted by others in their daily lives, which in turn leads to:
From the comments, it can be inferred that the questioner is more troubled by the fact that their mode of communication is not understood or accepted by others in their daily lives, which results in
In the context of interactions with unfamiliar individuals, there is often a paucity of conversational topics and a pervasive sense of unease. In contrast, conversations with semi-acquaintances tend to be more relaxed, with a greater willingness to discuss personal challenges. In such instances, I often find myself offering analytical insights and guidance.
In light of the concern that engaging in lengthy discourse may prove tedious for the other party, it is my intention to elucidate the distinction between "ordinary chatting" and "psychological counseling" from this vantage point. The ensuing discourse will not be constrained to a mere delineation of the aforementioned differences; rather, it will serve as a point of reference for the host in contemplating the nuances of this predicament.
In light of the concern that one might exhaust the topics of conversation, it is hoped that this delineation between "ordinary chatting" and "psychological counseling" will prove beneficial. The following exposition will not be limited to the differences between the two, but will provide a reference for the topic owner's thinking from the dilemma itself.
First, psychological counseling is a professional service with strict settings, which is essentially different from the active areas of the brain during ordinary conversation. It not only alters the emotional activity of the brain, but also reshapes the brain's structure.
First, psychological counseling is a professional service with strict settings, which is essentially different from the active areas of the brain in ordinary chatting. It not only alters the emotional activity of the brain, but also reshapes the brain's structure.
At first glance, the majority of psychological counseling occurs in the form of conversation. This method of "talk therapy" appears to be a relaxing and highly rewarding activity for individuals without professional training.
However, in practice, there is a considerable degree of synchronisation of behaviour between the counsellor and the client. This can be defined as the establishment and influence of a relationship alliance, which in turn affects the psychological health of the client.
The aforementioned conclusion is derived from the following research: Zhang, Y., Meng, T., Hou, Y.Y., Pan, Y.F., & Hu, Y. (2018). Interpersonal Brain Synchronization Associated with Working Alliance during Psychotherapy.
Should the client express interest, they are at liberty to pursue the matter independently.
In sum, the inquirer can discern in everyday discourse whether, in
In addition, the inquirer may discern in everyday discourse whether, beyond adopting an "uninvolved perspective" and "handing over the initiative to others" in speech, they have also achieved synchrony in nonverbal communication.
In human communication, nonverbal messages convey a significantly greater quantity of information than verbal messages. Indeed, the former account for 97% of the information conveyed, while the latter account for only 3%.
2. The content of the chat can be either profound or superficial. A daily chat about the weather and food is an innocuous way to initiate a conversation.
2. The content of the chat can be either profound or superficial. One strategy for circumventing awkward conversations is to commence with a harmless and relaxing topic, such as discussing the weather or food.
In psychological counseling, the counselor does not adopt an external perspective with regard to the client's situation. Instead, the counselor engages in active listening and demonstrates empathy.
The client experiences the counselor as sharing their breath and fate for the duration of the 50-minute session. Concurrently, the counselor rapidly identifies the factors influencing the client's current mental health while accepting the client's emotions.
In other words, the counselor's approach is to be both within the client's reality and outside of it. This is one of the reasons why this work requires continuous growth and extensive professional training in order to be able to provide services for which one can be compensated.
However, the daily communication of the questioner does not have such complex requirements. Interpersonal interactions are primarily focused on relationship-building, particularly given that individuals are already engaged in communication and forming connections with one another.
Once the objective has been grasped, it is common practice to commence with a relatively innocuous subject.
It is my hope that the aforementioned information will prove inspirational to the reader.
I am a psychologist whose focus is not on the exploration of human nature, but rather on the examination of the human heart. I extend my best wishes to you.
Comments
I understand where you're coming from. When someone asks about my sign, I often wonder what they are really looking for. It's intriguing to think that a simple "why do you ask?" could shut down the conversation. But in everyday chats, it seems people prefer lighthearted responses like comparing signs to celebrities. It's almost as if we have different modes of communication, and sometimes I find myself wanting to delve deeper into understanding others. I've always been inclined to take on an outsider's perspective, much like a counselor would, but this can make casual conversations with strangers or semiacquaintances quite challenging.
It's interesting how you reflect on your conversational style. Asking "why do you ask?" can indeed come off as probing and might not be suitable for all situations. Yet, when talking with acquaintances who share their troubles, you naturally slip into a counseling role. There's a comfort in analyzing and offering insights, even if it doesn't always feel right. The balance between leading a conversation and letting it flow organically is something many of us struggle with, especially when we're used to giving the reins to others.
Your point about the dynamic between client and counselor resonates with me. In therapy, there's a builtin trust that allows deep conversations to unfold smoothly. But in daily interactions, especially with people we don't know well, finding common ground can be tough. I think part of the challenge is learning how to engage without immediately reverting to a questioning stance. Sometimes, just sharing lighter topics or personal anecdotes can help ease the tension and create a more relaxed atmosphere.